10M16DAF256C8G vs 10M16DCF484C7G

10M16DAF256C8G과 10M16DCF484C7G에 대한 심층 비교를 통해 두 제품의 사양 및 주요 특징에 대한 유용한 정보를 얻을 수 있습니다. RoHS 준수 여부, REACH 인증 상태, 시리즈, 장착 방식, 패키지 유형 및 기타 관련 특성을 포함한 중요한 요소들을 자세히 다룹니다. 두 제품의 차이점을 나란히 제시함으로써 부품 선택이 간소화되어 특정 용도에 가장 적합한 옵션을 쉽게 선택할 수 있습니다.

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Compatible functional replacement candidate

The 10M16DAF256C8G and 10M16DCF484C7G are both Intel MAX 10 FPGA devices sharing the same 16,000 logic element density, core architecture, and 3.3 V configuration scheme, making them functionally interchangeable at the logic level. However, they differ in package type, pin count, and speed grade, so a direct drop-in replacement is not possible without PCB redesign and timing revalidation. The 10M16DAF256C8G offers a larger 256-pin FBGA package with more user I/O, while the 10M16DCF484C7G provides a compact 484-pin FBGA with a faster C7 speed grade. Designers should treat this pairing as a functional replacement candidate subject to package, I/O, and timing verification.

Logic Density High match
Package Type Validation required
I/O Count Validation required
Speed Grade Not compatible

Parts at a glance

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter 10M16DAF256C8G 10M16DCF484C7G Why it matters
Family MAX 10 MAX 10 Both devices belong to the same Intel MAX 10 FPGA family, which supports functional substitutability at the architecture level.
Logic Elements (LEs) 16,000 16,000 Equal logic capacity means both can implement the same logic designs without resource constraints.
Package 256-pin FBGA 484-pin FBGA Different package footprints and pin counts affect PCB layout, routing, and mechanical compatibility.
Package Size 17 x 17 mm 23 x 23 mm Board space and mechanical constraints differ, impacting physical drop-in replacement.
Maximum User I/O 178 320 The 484-pin device offers more I/O, enabling more peripheral connections but requiring a larger board.
Speed Grade 8 (fastest) 7 (slower) Speed grade affects maximum operating frequency and timing closure; a slower grade may not meet the same performance targets.
Operating Temperature Range Commercial (0°C to 85°C) Commercial (0°C to 85°C) Identical temperature ranges ensure both devices work in the same environmental conditions.
Embedded Memory 5,888 Kbits 5,888 Kbits Equal on-chip memory supports the same data buffering and storage requirements.
Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) Yes (1 MSPS, 12-bit) Yes (1 MSPS, 12-bit) Both integrate an ADC, allowing analog signal monitoring without external components.
Configuration Flash Memory Yes (internal) Yes (internal) Internal configuration flash enables single-chip operation and instant-on capability for both devices.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification 10M16DAF256C8G 10M16DCF484C7G
Supplier - Intel
Series MAX® 10 MAX® 10
Part Status Active Active
Number of LABs/CLBs 1000 1000
Number of Logic Elements/Cells 16000 16000
Total RAM Bits 562176 562176
Number of I/O 178 320
Voltage - Supply 1.15V ~ 1.25V 1.15V ~ 1.25V
Mounting Type Surface Mount Surface Mount
Operating Temperature 0°C ~ 85°C (TJ) 0°C ~ 85°C (TJ)

Frequently asked questions

What are the key differences between the 10M16DAF256C8G and the 10M16DCF484C7G?

The 10M16DAF256C8G is a MAX 10 FPGA in a 256-pin FineLine BGA package with a commercial temperature grade of 0°C to 85°C junction temperature and speed grade 8. The 10M16DCF484C7G is a MAX 10 FPGA in a 484-pin FineLine BGA package with a commercial temperature grade of 0°C to 85°C junction temperature and speed grade 7. Both devices feature 16,000 logic elements (LEs), but they differ in package, pin count, and speed grade.

Do the 10M16DAF256C8G and 10M16DCF484C7G have the same logic density?

Yes. Both devices are part of the Intel MAX 10 FPGA family and provide 16,000 logic elements (LEs), along with identical embedded memory and DSP block resources as defined by the MAX 10 10M16 device specification.

Can the 10M16DAF256C8G be used as a drop-in replacement for the 10M16DCF484C7G?

No. The two devices have different package types and pin counts: the 10M16DAF256C8G uses a 256-pin FineLine BGA (FBGA) package, while the 10M16DCF484C7G uses a 484-pin FineLine BGA (FBGA) package. The PCB footprint, pinout, and available I/O pins differ, so a direct drop-in replacement is not possible without a redesign.

What is the difference in speed grade between the 10M16DAF256C8G and the 10M16DCF484C7G?

The 10M16DAF256C8G has a speed grade of 8, while the 10M16DCF484C7G has a speed grade of 7. In Intel FPGA nomenclature, a lower speed grade number indicates a faster device. Therefore, the 10M16DCF484C7G (speed grade 7) offers higher performance than the 10M16DAF256C8G (speed grade 8).

Are the operating temperature ranges the same for both devices?

Yes. Both the 10M16DAF256C8G and the 10M16DCF484C7G are specified with a commercial temperature grade, supporting a junction temperature (TJ) range of 0°C to 85°C.

Which device offers more user I/O pins?

The 10M16DCF484C7G, with its 484-pin FineLine BGA package, provides more user I/O pins than the 10M16DAF256C8G, which is housed in a 256-pin FineLine BGA package. The exact number of user I/O pins for each device should be confirmed from the official Intel MAX 10 device pin-out files.

Do both devices support the same configuration methods?

Yes. Both the 10M16DAF256C8G and the 10M16DCF484C7G are MAX 10 FPGAs and support the same configuration schemes, including internal configuration via on-chip flash memory, as well as external configuration through JTAG and other supported modes defined in the MAX 10 FPGA device documentation.